top of page

Attachment, Generational Trauma / Episode 9 Show Notes

Updated: Mar 22, 2023


I was writing about generational trauma when I realized how integral the part is about having a secure, safe attachment with a parent

Parents are obviously carrying their own trauma from their own families

Which is affecting their ability to for a healthy attachment with their own kids

And they probably had the same problem with their parent(s)

But I think that the unhealthy attachment is pretty central to all of this and is passed on

The specific trauma is oftentimes passed on as well

But the emotional disconnection and relationship misattunement is a constant and I think a precursor to potentially something worse

And this stems from an unhealthy attachment

FUNDAMENTAL TO ALL OF THIS - Parents are down the polyvagal ladder

Now in danger mode = unhealthy neuroception & vagal brake is off

Unhealthy neuroception means they are not detecting danger cues accurately, nor are they shifting into the appropriate autonomic state

They aren’t going into safe & social state when they are actually safe

No longer have access to their safe & social system

Sympathetic arousal for flight/fight and parasympathetic shut down = overreactions or under reactions, but follow the same themes:

Priorities are mixed up, not making safe decisions due to critical thinking being offline, not accurately detecting danger, not giving safety cues and now giving danger cues or actively rejecting or abandoning their children on some level

A parent can be more depressed or more anxious and still be a great parent, so this is really based on your subjective experience and this is a line for you to draw.

A parent chronically in a defensive state may not be capable of providing some fundamental needs for their child while also being safe & social

Example 1: With healthy neuroception, hearing a baby cry is a cue of danger and we shift down the ladder into a safe but sympathetic arousal and provide the baby what it needs - to be changed, fed, get attention or go to sleep, while providing safe and social cues

We feel the internal danger alarms that accompany a baby crying with healthy neuroception and can tolerate and provide for the need of the baby

Parents in a chronic defensive state are aware of their baby crying, but aren’t shifting into a safe but sympathetic arousal to take care of their baby’s needs

Or if they are acting on the alarm and providing for the need, it may not be consistent enough or with safe and social cues or it might be with a negative experience like: yelling, blaming, guilt trips

Just sticking a bottle in their mouth or leaving them unsupervised with a bottle isn’t the same as holding them gently, singing to them, rocking them

These rhythmic, melodic things like singing and rocking are only available when a parent is in their safe and social state

Where they have access to their prosodic voices and can listen to the rhythms of their bodies to rock a little bit

Example could also be a child that throws a tantrum

Parents in their safe & social system will be more nurturing and patient

Parents in a defensive state will be more demanding, threatening, punitive

Example when a child reports abuse

Safe & social system parent will prioritize safety and be able to tolerate their flight/fight arousal, get the child the help they need and be a part of the treatment

Defensive state parents won’t be able to tolerate and might blame, shame, not believe or not appropriately act on the information

In these examples, the parent is not able to be a safe co-regulator and get attuned to the child’s autonomic state and emotional and protective needs

Let’s pause here a moment to make sure we’re understanding what’s being talked about.

Meeting the fundamental needs of the child plus being in a safe and social state is basically what it takes to form a secure, healthy attachment.

From Psychology Today - “It all starts with how parents respond to their children’s needs and soothe (or not) the children when they are frightened or distressed. When parents are consistently available, warm, and responsive, the children develop secure attachment styles.”

Through being in a safe & social state, we are providing safety cues and the co-regulation necessary for a child to be in their own safe & social system.

A parent in their safe & social system is going to naturally be providing for the basic needs of their children.

A parent not in their safe & social system is not necessarily going to be providing for the needs of their children. And if they are, it will not be with safety cues necessary for co-regulation.

In fact, if the parent is meeting the needs of their child without the safety, then the child will grow up understanding that danger and basic needs go hand in hand.

And they will adapt to get their needs met by dropping and staying down the ladder.

Who do you think is least likely to be traumatized and pass it onto the next generation?

Someone who survives a traumatic event, but is able to go to a safe person and get the help they need and eventually work their way out of their shut down state?

Or someone that survives a trauma, but does not go to a safe person… because they don’t have a safe person?

Or someone that survived a traumatic event, tells someone, and gets a negative response, like being shamed or blamed?

Of course this isn’t a prognosis for any one individual’s future. I can’t know that. But based on my experience with working with families, it’s the ones that don’t have a safe person or aren’t believed that are more likely to pass on these unhealthy attachments and traumas to the next generation.

Because they’re in a danger state, these parents are not as emotionally available

Parents I’ve worked with didn’t receive cues of safety, safe experiences of love, of touch,

Didn’t get told they were loved

Didn’t get shown they were loved

Didn’t feel loved

Expressing love or connecting with someone else is terrifying, vulnerable and feels weak

In a danger state, these are intolerable

Leaving the child emotionally alone, emotionally neglected or emotionally abused

Being present physically is not the same as being present emotionally.

Knowing love versus Feeling love is a common theme in therapy

Being alone and emotionally isolated are major cues of danger, of being rejected from the family and being vulnerable

Being alone is a consistent theme in therapy

Commonly is underneath many of the presenting problems that I am treating

Because they’re in danger mode, their self-regulation is compromised as well as their ability to play

Co-regulation is now not being provided and neither is exercising the vagal brake, which commonly happens through play and also by learning through consequences from a parent

Consequences from these parents are erratic, extreme, non-existent, unpredictable

A child cannot exercise their vagal brake in this because there’s no safety to come back to

Play is nonexistent or unsafe

A healthy attachment is less likely since the child is also joining their parent in a defensive state and now there are two dysregulated nervous systems

But this first healthy attachment is key for the future

Recognizing safe friendships and relationships in the future is difficult

There’s a domino effect that is passed on through generations

Children are being raised without a safe, protective connection with an adult.

They are being set up for failure at a young age.

So just from looking at attachment and emotional abuse or abandonment, we can see that a child is left alone and unprotected by a safe parent figure

Leaving them in a defensive state, which they will carry into the school system, into dangerous situations in their teens, into relationships and into eventually being a parent.

This child is already in a defensive state and unable to use their social engagement system

If they never experience a safe relationship, they won’t be able to provide one. And they’ll be seeking out relationships that aren’t safe.

This is a setup for failure.


Everything I have laid out does not even really consider physical and sexual abuse

Which comes along with denial, keeping secrets, blame and shame and more

Being alone is an undercurrent in all the kids I have worked with

We can survive and recover from horrible events if we have someone safe to go to

You’d be surprised what someone will tell you when you ask them when things changed for them

Answer might not be when the abuse happened

As in, “When did things get worse for you?”

Answer might be when they lost the safe person, their protection

Like a relative, someone and somewhere away from the abuse

But the relative passes away or moves away

Or when their attempt to get help fails

Like a parent doesn’t believe them

This is often the event that breaks them entirely and the small bit of hope dies

Point being, taking that emotional isolation, being alone, and combining it with physical abuse, sexual abuse or neglect is a crippling combination and inevitably leads to a shut down for the child victim

They will get this need met though. Or as best they can.

They have to connect. They have to feel safe and cared about.

They’ll find this through peers or love interests.

But they haven’t experienced connection in a safe way and are existing down the ladder.

They don’t know safety and can’t detect danger accurately, this is a bad bad combination

Like attracts like - they will attract relationships who are also down the ladder

These kids who lack a safe and protective home are going to put themselves in situations where they are more likely to be traumatized

Like buying drugs, drinking at parties, submitting to dangerous people

The wrong person is more likely to come along and take advantage of a child in a danger or life threat state

Like hunting prey and targeting the weaker member of the herd that has fallen behind

But the wrong partner is going to do so by disguising him or herself as protective and caring

You gotta believe me on this, this is what I am hearing from the kids I work with

They desperately want to belong

And that desperation is exploited by a predator

And they are willing to repeatedly give them chances

They haven’t seen a healthy relationship.

They haven’t experienced a healthy relationship.

They’re not detecting danger cues.

They’re putting themselves in dangerous situations.

The most dangerous peers are targeting them.

Their homes often don’t have predictable consequences or predictable relationships.

These are ingredients for further trauma.

And then these kids will grow up and repeat with their own.

And those kids will need to get their needs met and eventually be in the wrong situation or with the wrong person.

And so on.

243 views0 comments


Out Now

Stuck Not Broken: Book 1 is now available!


Learn the Polyvagal Theory clearly and simply. Understand yourself without shame, blame, or judgment.

bottom of page